This page was generated from /home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/blm/checkouts/latest/docs/tasks/task6_extra-MT49E.ipynb.
Interactive online version:
Slideshow:
1.7. MT49E Extra: Sensitivity Analysis of Modelled \(Q_E\)¶
1.7.1. Objectives¶
To assess which parameters and varaiables influence your model most
Tips:
What are the effects of systematically perturbing \(Q^*\), \(Q_G\), canopy resistance \(r_c\), roughness length \(z_0\) in the Penman Monteith equation?
Which uncertainty has the biggest effect on the estimated fluxes?
Derive an overall estimate for the accuracy of the Penman-Monteith method for both \(Q_E\) and \(Q_H\). Do this by assuming reasonable errors in the parameters and variables.
What is the impact of assuming neutral conditions versus actual stability conditions on the calculated value of \(r_a\)?
What error in the fluxes does this cause?
How will this error vary for extremely unstable or stable conditions?
1.7.2. Tasks: TODO¶
1.7.2.1. load necessary packages¶
[1]:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import pandas as pd
from pathlib import Path
1.7.2.2. load data¶
[3]:
# code
1.7.2.3. examine data¶
[4]:
# code and plot